Measuring Hydrostatic Head (Pressure) – Step 2 of 12

Jun 24
2009

Q: What Causes Hydrostatic Head or Hydraulic Water Pressure?

Q: How do you Measure Hydrostatic Head for
Small & Micro Hydropower System Site Evaluations?

A:  Hydrostatic Head – is the pressure rise caused by gravity acting on a column of water or fluid that is not in motion. In the case of a small or micro hydropower system it comes from the difference in elevation between the intake of the hydro system penstock and downhill to the input side of the water turbine.

Figure 1 Hydrostatic Head Measure using a Surveyors Transit or Straight Board & Levels – Method 1 of 3 see page link for more details on all 3 methods.

Link to Details on all 3 Methods for Measuring Hydrostatic Head for your site.

Hydraulic Head in Height Difference or Pressure

Head can be given as either the difference in elevation or vertical height (Head is a measured height in feet or meters) or it can be expressed as the pressure of the same water column at the turbine inlet (Pressure stated in PSI, KPA, Newtons/m^2, etc.) Either hydraulic head elevation difference or head pressure can be used as it is relatively simple to convert between them as we discuss later.

For Small & Micro Hydropower Systems, Measure Head Accurately!

The hydro system head measurements will need to be made very accurately since these head measurements play an important role in determination of other hydroelectric system parameters as well.

These head-pressure related system parameters include things such as; hydro turbine selection, system efficiency and fluid dynamic issues. For example; Kaplan, Cross-flow, Francis or Pelton turbines, hydrodynamics of turbine runner blade or bucket design, penstock material and strength, valve types, etc. are all impacted directly by the head measurement. All of these in turn impact the engineering and financial side of the hydro system design.

Because good hydro system design is so dependent on the accuracy of head measurement we will skip the use of mechanical altimeters and GPS units. Typically these have altitude errors on the order of tens of feet or more unless special survey quality GPS instruments are used. As you will see in method 3 below there are instruments that can do the job accurately, repeatedly, with ease and reasonably low cost.

Three accurate hydropower head measurement methods for measuring hydrostatic head are given in the links below, pick one that fits your need or budget and feel free to let us know about any new hydro head measurement methods you have:

The detailed article on the 3 Methods for Measuring Hydrostatic Head for your hydro site is on a different page.  Read the full article page on methods 1 to 3 for more…

Or you can visit the SmallHydro Info page if you wish to visit that article later.  We’ll be placing a few important reference article links there as we move through the 12 step Small & Micro Hydropower program. The summary follows…

Method 1 – Hydro Head Measure with Surveyors Transit, Levels & Pole

This method uses a Surveyor’s transit or contractor’s levels and a marked pole. You can use a 20 ft section of PVC pipe marked with a measuring tape attached for easier reading. The transit can be replaced by a straight board and level for economy, watch out for hydro head error buildup with short segments or warped boards or bad leveling though.   For more visit;  Method 1 to 3 details

Method 2 – Measure Head indirectly with Hose and Pressure gauge

If the distance is short enough, you can use one or more garden hoses to measure Head.  This method relies on the fact that each vertical foot of Head creates 0.433 psi of water pressure.  For example, 100 vertical feet will generate 43.3 psi in the lower end of your Penstock.  By measuring the pressure in the hose, you can use this conversion factor to calculate the elevation change of your system. We give metric conversions at the bottom of the detailed article too.

Method 3 – Measure Hydro Head with Precision Zip-Level Pro 2000™

Zip Level Pro 2000 Measure Head

Zip Level Pro 2000 Measure Head

This method is unique to DoradoVista’s approach to hydropower head measurement. We will also show how to use it for accurate flow measurement in a later post about flow measurement methods. It is a very accurate differential pressure based geotechnical instrument. It is extremely accurate when used according to the instructions given by Technidea the manufacturer. This instrument saves time, labor (one person operation is easy) and is the most accurate method we know of for a decent price. 

Read SmallHydro’s Review of the ZipLevel Pro 2000

Hydro Turbine Size a few Questions and Answers

Jun 18
2009

Here’s some questions from Ben, one of our  Small & Micro Hydropower Newsletter readers. He asked these questions regarding turbine sizes, efficiency and penstock design.

Sincerely,
Jess

Hydro System Design Questions:

——– Original Message ——–
Subject: turbine size
From: Ben
Date: Thu, June 11, 2009 8:16 am To: jess.blog@smallhydro.com  

Jess,

  1. Was wondering, does a smaller hydro propeller, ( not sure of terminology) add rpm’s thus giving more electric production??  If so, what is a general increase?? 
  2. Also,  in the formula you sent me about converting to psi, how can you increase the effeciency rating of 72%, in general terms???  
  3. Finally, on the penstock, how much do you typically decrease the intake from the main water line??  In other words,  with a 4″ line is the penstock intake 4″ or does it decrease to 3″, and what if you decreased it to 2″ penstock intake??  Will that increase the flow pressure and what impact does it have on spinning the turbine??    I still don’t have specifics but working on it.

Thank you,
 Ben 

Hi Ben,

Looking at your questions I’ll try and answer them the best I can.  Turbine deisgn and choice is complex and efficiency of hydro design is also.  Mixing both in one response is a great simplification. With that said here are my Answers.

Jess

Hydro System Design Answers:

  1. Choosing Smaller or larger propeller or water wheels is not the issue. Fluid flow over the hydro generator propulsion device gives rise to rotational motion. Rotor specific speed is the issue you refer to and different designs have higher or lower specific speeds due to the physics involved with that wheels geometry. That is the rotational speed of a rotor of one design compared to others will be higher or lower depending on the actual design or geometry involved regardless of scale. Specific speed is a comparative “unitless” number much like a Mach number is used for supersonic flow.  Specific speed often stated something like this “ηs= η/η0″. Efficiency at a given flow/pressure regime depends on this number a lot. Enough on that topic for now. What a smaller diameter wheel (using a pelton wheel for example) does is imply that for a given water jet velocity they must spin at a faster rate to produce their optimum power output. Max Pelton efficiency is at about 47% of the water jet velocity. This speed maximizes power output for given a pelton impulse design. So with all other factors being fixed the wheels pitch or diameter will increase rotational speed to keep the center line of water impact moving at the same 47% linear speed of the water jet. Power will be about the same, but generator frequency will change with rotational speed which may make a speed reducer/increaser a requirement.
  2. Increasing hydro system %efficiency is a complex art, starting with intake and Penstock friction, then turbine choice & performance curve optimization, combined with inlet valve and draft tube design if required, then any speed transmission or reducer friction, next will be generator/alternator efficiency, finally the transmission losses including wires, transformer/inverter systems. The 72% efficiency example I give is a very simple average of a model 85% turbine x 85% geneator/transmission output.  Mileage for your site and turbine choices will vary. The more accurate you make your hydropower model the better the result will be. You will be modeling power production and loss until the first water flows through the system, then you get your course grade based on how close your “Real/Model” score approaches 100% of actual results.
  3. The last part of your request has more to do with jet design and penstock friction. Typically the penstock will be much larger diameter than the jet intake. The pipe friction means that there is a large dynamic head loss over long distance flows. The jet or turbine intake design then takes the pressure drop and accelerates water through the intake throat, a much smaller distance.   These cross sectional intake areas are much smaller on higher head units like pelton and turgo units vs. lower head pressure ones like Francis, PAT and Kaplan/Popeller ones.  That’s part of why the low head turbine prices rise so rapidly with flow rate, there’s a large opening to a much larger volume of machine for the same output power. Generally you should seek to keep penstock intakes and penstocks free of friction loss, then reducers at the turbine may be possible if required. For example a PAT I know of takes a >30inch diameter main and necks it down to 10inches right at the PAT input valve. The overall system efficiency is just a part of the equation, remember those big penstocks cost big bucks so make sure you balance the equation for optimum water power system ROI$.

I hope this helps clarify things,

Sincerely,
Jess
DoradoVista, Inc.
PS.  I plan to post this set of question/answers on the Blog OK? Generic name & content only.

Ben replied,

Use the question, so far I am 2 for 2 in getting my questions in the blog. Batting a thousand here.
Thank you for the answers.
Ben

You’re welcome!
Jess

Small Hydro Regulations – Question #3

Jun 10
2009

This Week’s Small Hydro Question for You -

Another Small & Micro hydropower question for you to consider and answer in the comments on this post:

What Small &  Micro Hydro regulation issues do you find most difficult for you?

Jess

Stainless Steel Pelton Nozzle and Spear Valve

Stainless Steel Pelton Nozzle and Spear Valve

12 Step Hydropower Evaluation Process – Overview

Jun 10
2009

The following diagram depicts DoradoVista’s twelve steps to evaluate a Small or Micro Hydropower site.  As mentioned last month we will be covering each of the twelve evaluation steps in more detail as we update our Small & Micro Hydropower posts.  Again please add comments or questions to each post so that we can address your needs more adequately.

12 Step Small & Micro Hydropower Evaluation Process

12 Step Small & Micro Hydropower Evaluation Process

Hydro Prospector Jess

Got SmallHydro?sidebar-pic
How may we help you Prospect for Small & Micro Hydropower Resources?