The following diagram depicts DoradoVista’s twelve steps to evaluate a Small or Micro Hydropower site. As mentioned last month we will be covering each of the twelve evaluation steps in more detail as we update our Small & Micro Hydropower posts. Again please add comments or questions to each post so that we can address your needs more adequately.
Small Hydropower & Micro Hydropower
Your Online Small Hydroelectric Power Resource!
3 Responses to “12 Step Hydropower Evaluation Process – Overview”
Leave a Reply
-
-
Recent Posts
- Measuring Streamflow Q. Using a Rectangular Slotted Weir
- Estimation of Water Flow Rate Q Using Average Cross-section
- Measure Flow Rate Q Using the California Pipe Method
- Measuring the flow rate Q from an open pipe
- Open Pipe Flow Chart – Full Flow Calculation Table
- Stream Flow Measurement – Conductivity meter – suggestions.
Pelton Wheel – 350 kW
Pages
Past Posts
-
SmallHydro Globe
Anchors DoradoVista ecology flow duration curve Foundation Generator frequency hydro Hydro calculations hydroelectric Hydro infrastructure Hydro power generator Hydropower Head Hydropower planning Hydropower ROI Hydropower site survey tools Hydro Regulations Hydro Site Development issues Hydro site survey Hydro site survey procedures Hydro system design Hydro turbine efficiency Hydro turbine speed in stream hydropower irrigation system design Measuring Hydropower Stream Flow Micro hydro microhydroelectric Micro Hydropower Pelton wheel Penstock Pipeline RSS Run of River Small & Micro Hydropower Small & Micro Hydropower Newsletter Small Hydro Smallhydro smallhydro.com SmallHydro Logo Small Hydropower Spear Valve or Needle Valve Stream Flow measurement twitter Variable stream flow Water Hammer
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.
SmallHydro.com
SmallHydro Articles
Articles & other... soonDrago’s Lightning
Post Topic Cloud (links)
Anchors DoradoVista ecology flow duration curve Foundation Generator frequency hydro Hydro calculations hydroelectric Hydro infrastructure Hydro power generator Hydropower Head Hydropower planning Hydropower ROI Hydropower site survey tools Hydro Regulations Hydro Site Development issues Hydro site survey Hydro site survey procedures Hydro system design Hydro turbine efficiency Hydro turbine speed in stream hydropower irrigation system design Measuring Hydropower Stream Flow Micro hydro microhydroelectric Micro Hydropower Pelton wheel Penstock Pipeline RSS Run of River Small & Micro Hydropower Small & Micro Hydropower Newsletter Small Hydro Smallhydro smallhydro.com SmallHydro Logo Small Hydropower Spear Valve or Needle Valve Stream Flow measurement twitter Variable stream flow Water HammerMeta
SmallHydro
Hydro Prospector Jess

How may we help you Prospect for Small & Micro Hydropower Resources?
Reader Comments
- Denis Brady on Meeting Your Hydro Power Needs – Step 1 of 12
- Denis Brady on Estimation of Water Flow Rate Q Using Average Cross-section
- sutrisno on Hydropower Calculation Example in Metric (SI) & British (US) units
- Jivan shrestha on Estimation of Water Flow Rate Q Using Average Cross-section
- pravace on Welcome to SmallHydro.com!

























June 11th, 2009 at 6:41 am
#4 PENSTOCK & CHANNELS…How do I determine the diameter of the pipeline(penstock) to carry a given amount of water i.e. 8gps, etc. to my turbine?
How does the ‘head’ affect the pressure and in turn the amount of water a given diameter pipe can deliver?
June 11th, 2009 at 5:55 pm
Penstocks and Channel designs will get a more thorough treatment in a future series of Posts. This is one key to success in any Hydro system design that we want to help you with. It will make or break your hydro ROI.
To start with there are several competing fluid dynamic interactions going on when water flows in a pipe. For optimum design of a hydro system you must consider each of these effects in unison to obtain a truly optimum design. Where an optimum design gives the best power output for a given water flow/head combination for the lowest overall cost.
Bigger pipes are more expensive and yet may pay off if they yield enough extra power. That’s part of why higher head is better in general, smaller penstocks and turbines result.
Head affects pressure as a linear function of water column or height (gravity and density.) In turn the pressure affects the volume flow of water through a jet in a way that increases with pressure.
Since both volume and pressure increase with height of water column (head) the net power output increases slightly faster with head than flow. (Power increases approximately with the head^3/2 power) Again, it’s generally better to increase head to max than to try and increase flow to max.
All that means it’s a tradeoff between power(energy value), efficiency and system cost.
The laws and tables involved can be tricky to use but we’ll try to help. In the mean time drop us a note if you have a specific design problem.
Jess
July 26th, 2009 at 10:15 am
I want to draw water from our creek to the top of the hill (50ft) by syphon then allow gravity to drain it down stream to a lower elevation continuing the syphon technique.. At the lower elevation discharge, I would like to install a power generation system. The syphon pipe and discharge would 6″ diameter. Given the equipment available today, “How much electrical power can be generated per kW hour?
Thank you for your assistance.
Steve